Decision table
Prices were checked on September 2, 2026. Consult the
live pricing page before production use.
A practical selection path
- Keep
gemini-2.5-flash-imagewhen an existing stable integration works and migration has no clear benefit. - For a new 1K-only workload, compare Lite with the original model using your real prompts; Lite is the current efficiency-focused option.
- Start most new multi-resolution integrations with
gemini-3.1-flash-image. - Test
gemini-3-pro-imageagainst Flash on the same high-value brief before accepting the premium.
What the live run can and cannot show
The same 1:1 ceramic-object brief completed across all four model IDs. The outputs confirmed size tiers, edit support, task completion, response fields, and MIME variation. They do not form a controlled visual-quality benchmark: the synchronous Flash and Pro requests used higher resolutions than the other models, and a single prompt cannot represent every production workload.Open the model guide
Original Nano Banana
Review migration and fixed-resolution tradeoffs.
Nano Banana 2 Lite
Build a current 1K-only integration.
Nano Banana 2
Use the general-purpose multi-resolution model.
Nano Banana Pro
Evaluate premium design and 4K work.